When our founding fathers of the United States of America
created our country they included a list of laws to protect the rights of each
individual citizen. The Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment of this document
clearly states that
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the
security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
not be infringed.”
Some may claim that this amendment is irrelevant in modern
day society, but in a society where it is easy for criminals to purchase a
firearm shouldn’t citizens have the right to protect themselves?
The recent gun control debate has created irrational
conceptions about the role of guns in the harming of others. Guns are inanimate
objects which fire high powered projectiles. Guns are objects that could be
used to harm or more importantly protect. They are not responsible for the murders and
massacres caused. Humans are the ones we should be looking at for being
responsible for these disasters. To simply restate my point,
By creating these laws they are merely pointing the blame in
the wrong direction. The expanding gun control laws will not provide more
protect for our citizens but rather they will make it easier for criminals to
harm the innocent. These laws also target those who already carry guns although
they have no criminal intent in any way. In my personal opinion these gun
control laws will not bring upon the outcome they hope to intend but will
rather endanger more citizens more likely than it will protect.
One of the most common misconceptions is that with increased
gun control laws nobody will be able to harm one another since guns will be outlawed.
This is obviously not true; our country’s history has proven that despite
prohibition people will find a way to access illegal substances. This makes it
extremely dangerous when citizens are encountered with individuals with a gun
and do not have one to protect themselves with. Similarly if a robber was to
attack your house with a weapon you will be defenseless.
Nikki Goeser is licensed gun carrier who lost her husband one
night when a stalker followed them and murdered him right in front of her. Even
though she was licensed to carry a weapon, Tennessee law prohibits citizens to
carry firearms in restaurants she had to watch helpless as her husband was
murdered. Here is the article with further information about this story. This story is only one of many that will continue to happen if we limit our
citizens the right to protect themselves.
Gun control laws are prominent all over the nation and in
some areas they have already been successfully passed. Maryland’s Governor
Martin O’Malley recently passed stricter gun control laws as a response to the
Sandy Hook shooting. This bans all assault weapons and requires finger printing
for all citizens who wise to purchase a gun. These laws have not reduced the crime rate and in fact it is actually getting worse. It is clear example of how the alteration of laws will not automatically
yield positive results.
Other laws in place also unjust in the reaction towards
those who have guns. In New York the penalty for carrying a weapon with 11
rounds can be charged with felony charges similar to child sexual assault.
This outrageous sentence shows the extreme level of punishment we would apply
to our citizens who simply want to exercise their second amendment right.
Despite all of these discussions of events and statistics it
is important to understand that these tragedies involving guns will not be
stopped with further laws. These events are merely indicators of a much greater
problem that involves our entire nation. Guns are not the problem here. We as a
country must realize that people behind these violent actions are responsible.
As a country we are quick to blame media as a separate cause
for these tragedies. That those video games children constantly play are
creating killers. But who bought them those video games? Who allowed them to
watch those TV shows? We must look to the root of the problem that our society
is unwilling to blame themselves as the cause of creating unstable citizens who
may act out in aggression. As parents it is important to teach your children
that the violence they see on television and video games is fake and
unacceptable. Parents should not be raising their children in the mindset that
violence is an acceptable behavior. I should not need to explain the reasoning
behind that.
Accidental incidents where children gain access to guns are
not the fault of the weapons. The owners of the guns must be more responsible
to reduce the chance of danger. Similarly, when children are troubled it is up
to the parents or even teachers to take notice. Communicating is crucial in these situations. It should
not take a devastating act of violence for the parents or friends of that
person to realize there is something terribly going wrong in that person’s
life. People are affected and changed by how they are treated by those around
them.
A father of a Sandy Hook student stated his own personal
position against gun control. His message to is perfectly clear. It was an evil
person that murdered those children, not guns. Every citizen deserves the right
to exercise their right to bear arms in self-defense. These gun control laws
will not change the fact that these children were not protected by the safety
procedures and police. The YouTube link provided shows his whole statement.
We should focus our efforts to fix our society in different
ways instead of more restrictive legislature. Crime is more prevalent in lower
income communities and we should focus our efforts in fixing these
environments. If we implement stricter gun control laws these citizens will
have a harder time protecting themselves against those criminals.
In the end all that matters is the safety of those you care
about. With restrictive gun control laws you will lose that ability to protect
them. Changing gun control laws will not change the violent nature of these
people. Even without guns they will find other weapons to harm others some which
way be more gruesome. If we remove guns from our society completely the
millions of citizens who no longer carry weapons will be victim to criminals
who will continue to carry firearms all over the nation. Should our government
be able to deny their citizens their constitutional right to protect those they
love and care for? What happens when the police do not respond fast enough?
What happens to the safety of the American citizen? These are all question I
implore you to consider when you make the decision about gun control laws. Make
sure whatever decision you make is based on knowledge and careful
consideration, because these laws will affect the lives of not only us but
future generations to come.
Alex,
ReplyDeleteYou bring up a good rhetorical question that relates to the lack of accountability our society seems to be imposing towards individuals. Such as blaming violent video games without looking at who bought the video games and posing real solutions to the increasing crime rates in the inner city. Some of the current discourse fails to recognize that we do have a 2nd Amendment right to own a firearm. The real debate should involve an honest discussion about our mental health system and the ways in which we can prevent mentally ill people from attaining guns in the future.
Did you know that Chicago is considered more dangerous now than Afghanistan? And they have the strictest gun laws in the nation. By implementing further restrictive measures on guns will not decrease gun violence because the criminals are already getting guns illegally. In the end, the ones who are really being harmed are the legal gun owners.
- Jordan Hooper
Chicago Homicides Outnumber U.S. Troop Killings in Afghanistan
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/16/chicago-homicide-rate-wor_n_1602692.html
Alex,
ReplyDeleteI really like your post. It brings up the real cause of gun violence instead of what the media portrays all the time. Video games, movies, and hip hop are never the true causes of violence in teens and adults. While they may have some influences on behavior, your point about having better parenting and education is amazing. I hope Grand Theft Auto V does not get hated on.
-M.C. Anonymous
Alex,
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with you that criminals who use guns for hurting others rather than protection are the true cause for gun violence. However, don't you think the Second Amendment is a bit outdated since it was adopted in 1791? It was written in a time when the United States was still young and had constant threats from other nations. Applying the Second Amendment to modern society means your taking it out of its original context established by our Founding Fathers. So are gun owners part of a "well regulated militia"? Or did our Founding Fathers meant for everyone to have the right to own firearms in the Second Amendment?
-Patrick Yu
Don't you think the first amendment is a bid outdated as well? Wouldn't any article in the Bill of Rights fall under your reasoning?
DeleteIt is not gun owners that fall under a "well regulated militia." It is a list, the presence of a well regulated militia, in addition to the right to bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Alex is right in saying that it is not the gun that is the issue, but the person behind it. If we focus on that, the constitutionality of it is irrelevant.
Alex,
ReplyDeleteYour post brings up some crucial points to heed and reflect on. It seems as though society's sense of morality is changing for the worse and self accountability is dwindling. People make decisions and carry out actions, and it is up to those people to foresee how it would affect those around them. If more people would think about their actions we would be living in a much better place.
-M.T.
Alex,
ReplyDeleteA thoughtful argument. One point that you briefly touched upon was the banning of assault weapons. While I have always believed that purchasing full-auto assault weapons and sub-machine guns is an absurdly extreme reaction for self-defense, I am not necessarily surprised to hear that such a ban is ineffective in reducing crime. Yet there may still be value in such a ban. One need only ask those affected by mass shootings, in which many of the perpetrators had ready access to such weaponry. The point - that stricter gun control laws (and specifically stricter background checks) are needed (and not at odds with the right to bear arms) - is a reflection of a wider point about mental illness stigma and treatment in society. I think this aligns well with your view that we have to "fix our society in different ways instead of our more restrictive legislature." In short, we need to treat the cause, not the symptoms.
- J.C.
Alex,
ReplyDeleteyour argument is really thoughtful and well executed. you make a great point that gun control laws are pointing fingers in the wrong direction. And I couldn't agree more with you on the fact that these gun control laws may backfire and further endanger the lives of the citizens. But I also can't help but mention the fact that an absence of a gun control law may increase the accessibility of fire arms. If that's the case then anyone with no-prior criminal or psychological history can get guns and use it at their will. I'm just playing the devil's advocate here. I don't have any opinion about gun control, but I think moderation is the key here. Sure, people should be able to protect themselves if someone wants to cause them physical harm. but that certainly does not mean that anyone should be allowed to buy guns anywhere. I think we, as a society, must find a balance between these two extremes.
-Kaubin